† Corresponding author. E-mail:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11604265, 51471134, 51572222, and 11704386) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Grant Nos. 3102018zy044 and 3102017jc01001).
In the previous study of longitudinal spin Seebeck effect (LSSE), the thermal gradient was often generated by inserting the sample between the cool bath and the hot bath. For practical use, this method is too cumbersome to be easily integrated into modern electrical circuits. Since the laser can be easily focused into a small region, it will be more convenient and friendly to the integrated circuit. In this paper, we systematically investigate the LSSE and spin Hall magnetoresistance (SMR) of the Pt/Y3Fe5O12 heterostructure under focused laser-heating. We find that the extremely large voltage of inverse spin Hall effect (VISHE) can be obtained by reducing the diameter of laser or increasing the number of light spots. Meanwhile, even under the illumination of the ultraviolet light which will excite the electron from the valence band to the conduction band in yttrium iron garnet (YIG), the magnitude of SMR is nearly constant. It indicates that the spin transport behavior of the adjacent Pt is independent of the electron configuration of YIG. The laser-heating method to generate LSSE will be very promising for modern integrated electronic circuits and will promote the application of spin caloritronics in practice.
Spin current generation has always been an important study of spintronics. The longitudinal spin Seebeck effect (LSSE) has been thought as an effective way to generate the spin current by the thermal gradient. This effect has been observed in a large range of systems, including ferrimagnets,[1–3] antiferromagnetic,[4] and even some paramagnetic materials.[5] Using a metal with strong spin–orbit coupling,[1,6–8] the thermally pumped spin current could be converted to charge current by the inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE). Recently, the conversion of the spin current generated by LSSE to the charge current was also observed in the topological insulator due to the inverse Rashba–Edelstein effect.[9–11] Though there were some disputes about the possible anomalous Nernst effect induced by the magnetized Pt due to the magnetic promixy effect,[12,13] it can be separated by inserting a copper between the yttrium iron garnet (YIG) and Pt,[14] or angle-dependent anisotropic magnetoresistance measurement.[15,16] In addition to the spin Seebeck effect, the spin Hall magnetoresistance (SMR) of Pt/YIG is also observed in the Pt/YIG heterostructure,[17] and it is thought to originate from two processes, namely, the charge current in Pt firstly produces a vertical spin current due to the spin Hall effect (SHE), and then the reflection of this spin current at the Pt/YIG interface generates a charge current that is superimposed on the original one,[18,19] leading to a new kind of magnetoresistance.
In order to generate thermal gradient, the samples are always sandwiched between a resistive heater and a colder bath with thermal sensors mounted on both sides to detect the temperature.[1,20–22] This way of generating a thermal gradient is always too cumbersome and cannot be easily integrated with modern electrical circuits. Recently, Weiler et al. found that the focused laser can be used to generate the longitudinal thermal gradient.[23] Kimling et al.[24] studied the time-resolved magneto–optic Kerr effect and found the measured time evolution of spin accumulation was on a picosecond time scale, which is too short for contributions from a bulk temperature gradient in YIG. Meanwhile, according to the finite element analysis,[25,26] the laser-induced thermal gradient is mainly located in the illuminated region instead of the whole sample when using the hot-cold bath. Since the laser can be easily focused on the small region, it will be more applicable to the integrated circuit.[27] However, the systematical investigation on the laser-heating technology is still lacking. Based on this consideration, we carry out a more detailed study on the LSSE and SMR in the Pt/YIG heterostructure under laser-heating, and it is found that the thermal magnons generated by different laser spots do not interfere with each other and they can lineally combine with each other. Therefore, we can separately manipulate the thermal magnons in different regions of YIG by different lasers. We also investigate the SMR of the Pt/YIG heterostructure under the illumination of 360 nm laser. As pointed out in several studies,[15,28,29] the SMR was proposed based on the conversion of charge/spin current under the combined actions of SHE and ISHE near the Pt/YIG interface. Since the photon energy of the ultraviolet laser is above the bandgap of YIG and will excite the electron from the valence band to the conduction band, the question naturally arises as whether the spin transport behavior will be influenced by the variation of electron state of YIG near the interface. Our result shows that the magnitude of SMR presents independence of the ultraviolet laser power, which indicates that the spin transport at the interface of YIG is stable enough even when the electron configuration of YIG near the interface is changed by the ultraviolet illumination. Our research sheds a new light on the application of the spin caloritronics in the electronic industry.
The YIG film was first grown above (111)-oriented Gd3Ga5O12 (5 mm × 3 mm × 0.5 mm) substrate by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) with a thickness of 40 nm which was calibrated by low-angle x-ray. Then Pt with an area of 5 mm × 0.5 mm and a thickness of 5 nm was deposited via the magnetron sputtering, on the top of YIG through a strip-shaped mask. The surface characteristics of YIG were detected by the atomic force microscopy, and the root mean square (RMS) roughness was less than 1.2 Å. Further details on the sample preparation and characterizations can be found in
The wavelength dependence of the optical absorbance is defined by Ia/I0, where I0 and Ia denote the incident and absorbed light intensities, respectively, as shown in Fig.
When the laser is focused on the sample surface, YIG will absorb part of the energy. Then an out-of-plane thermal gradient will induce thermal magnons due to LSSE. The spin accumulation will be converted to the charge current in the attached heavy metal due to the ISHE. As shown in Fig.
The detected voltage cannot be ascribed to the so-called photo–spin–voltaic effect. A recent study showed that when the Pt/YIG hybrid structure is exposed to the light, a photon-driven spin-dependent electron excitation will occur near the Pt–YIG interface, producing a photo–spin–voltaic effect.[34,35] Since this effect is independent of the direction of temperature gradient, reversing the direction of thermal gradient will not change its sign. We reversed the incident direction of the light and found a sign change of VISHE (as shown in Fig. S3).
The magnitude of VISHE is insensitive to the spot size of the laser, as shown in Fig.
It seems that the Pt layer behaves as a heater and distributes the ∇T uniformly in the YIG, but this is not the case. When the laser is focused on the transversal Pt electrode which is away from the longitudinal Pt, as shown in Fig.
As shown in Fig.
As shown in Figs.
According to Eq. (
In summary, we systematically investigate the LSSE and SMR under the illumination of ultraviolet and visible light in the Pt/YIG heterostructure. For LSSE, the VISHE is independent of the size and position of the laser, and thermal magnons generated by different laser spots can linearly combine with each other, meaning that the extremely large VISHE may be obtained by decreasing the size and increasing the number of lasers. Therefore, the laser-heating technology has substantial advantage over the traditional hot-cold-bath method for future application. Meanwhile, the spin-related phenomenon, SMR, which is thought to be sensitive to the interface of Pt/YIG, is nearly constant even when the electrons transfer from the valence band to the conduction band under the ultraviolet illumination.
See
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] | |
[24] | |
[25] | |
[26] | |
[27] | |
[28] | |
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] | |
[32] | |
[33] | |
[34] | |
[35] | |
[36] | |
[37] | |
[38] |